Home > Browse by Topics > Physical environment and geography > Marine water quality > Reef Rescue Marine Monitoring Program - Project - Assessment of terrestrial run-off entering the Great Barrier Reef (ACTFR-JCU)
Reef Rescue Marine Monitoring Program - Project - Assessment of terrestrial run-off entering the Great Barrier Reef (ACTFR-JCU)
- Devlin, Michelle, Dr,
- da Silva, Eduardo, Dr
- James Cook University,
- James Cook University
As part of the Reef Rescue Marine Monitoring Program (MMP), our project has been monitoring riverine flood plumes to assess concentrations and transport of major land-sourced pollutants to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) lagoon. The exposure of GBR reef and seagrass ecosystems to contaminants is estimated from the synthesis of: river discharge, water quality data sampled in inshore sites during flood conditions and the use of remote sensing technology to estimate flood plume extents and duration.
Three water types resulting from river floods have been identified and mapped over the GBR: (i) a “primary” water type characterized by high total suspended sediment values found in low salinity flood plume water; (ii) a “secondary” water type characterised by high phytoplankton biomass and elevated concentrations of coloured dissolved and detrital matter (CDOM) and (iii) a “tertiary” water type characterised by elevated CDOM+D (Figure 1)
Figure 1: Spatial classification of the three main water types to occur within the Wet Tropics NRM area, Great Barrier Reef. Extent and frequency of the primary water type (b) within a small but substantive inshore wedge out to a distance of 25 km offshore. Extent and frequency of the secondary water types as characterised by elevated chl-a concentrations occurs further offshore to a distance of 100 km. The full extent of all plumes, out to the edge of the tertiary plume, is shaded in yellow (a).
The extent of land-sourced pollutants in the GBR lagoon is calculated by combining mapped flood plumes (Figure 1) and pollutant loads (for example, Figure 2). When all this information is combined from a temporal and spatial perspective, we have a powerful tool for the prioritisation of the management of the catchments affecting the GBR Marine Park. For example, long term exposure to flood plumes carrying high dissolved inorganic nitrogen loads (DIN) (Figure 3) occurred in 19% and 11% of the total marine portion of the Wet Tropics and Burdekin regions, respectively.
Figure 2: Process of mapping the exposure of surface pollutants in flood plume waters. Annual load data is calculated as a proportional contribution based on catchment load in respect to overall GBR load. The load information is integrated with the surface distribution of flood plumes in the GBR. Surface mapping is taken over the period 2001 to 2010.
Figure 3: The distribution of the four categories of surface exposure for each of the pollutants (TSS, chl-a and PSII herbicides). Exposure is scaled from high to low with the highest exposure related to the highest flood plume extents (> 10) and the highest pollutant loads. Note that there is no exposure to PSII herbicides in Cape York water due to the very low area of fertilised agriculture. DIN loads in Cape York have very high levels of uncertainty and are not reported here.
Data sources are as follows:
River discharge
Daily river discharge and load data of the main rivers in North Queensland is acquired from the Department of Environment and Resource Management (http://watermonitoring.derm.qld.gov.au/host.htm). This data have been used to identify peaks of river discharge into the GBR lagoon, predict when bigger and more persistent plumes are likely to happen, and to estimate terrestrial inputs into the marine ecosystem.
Water quality sampling
Flood plume sampling during the North Queensland wet season (Dec – May) is carried out annually on an ad-hoc basis dependent on region of flooding. Plume water quality is measured through a combination of in situ water quality measurements (link to metadata) taken at peak and post flow conditions. Sample collection is typically focused on near-shore sites and river mouths and includes analysis of temperature, salinity, total suspended sediment, chlorophyll-a, nutrients, and pesticides and phytoplankton.
Flood plume extent and duration
Given the large size of the GBR Marine Park (350,000 km2), river plume extent, frequency, duration and composition are measured through the use of remote sensing products. Images from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on-board the NASA Earth Observation System Terra and Aqua spacecrafts are downloaded from the NASA web page (http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi/browse.pl?sen=am) as Level-0 data, and processed to extract several Level-2 products and true colour image. Water quality data are then used to validate the remotely sensed data.
Detailed information on the movement, frequency, spatial extent and composition of surface plumes in the GBR is attained by the use of innovative spatial analysis techniques, which integrate daily river discharge and load, water quality data and remote sensing products (Meta-data Table, link to meta-data).
Figure 4. Maximum extent of the flood plumes over the 2010-2011 wet season.
Key results and messages
Water quality sampling over the past four years under the MMP has been focused on the Burdekin, Fitzroy and Tully catchments. Sampling has also occurred less frequently in the Mackay Whitsunday region and Russell-Mulgrave. Previously to the MMP program, there has been sporadic sampling over a period of 18 years over all the GBR catchments. . Table 1 shows some typical concentrations in the plume waters over the GBR (average of all the historical data from 1991-2010). Plume movement in the GBR can be over a significant proportion of the GBR, as shown in the extent of the 2010-11 plumes (Figure 4).
GBR ecosystems such as coral reefs and seagrass beds are likely to reflect and respond to distinct regional differences in water quality driven by the occurrence and frequency of high river flow periods. The process of transport, delivery, and effect of these higher pollutant concentrations need to be continually measured and monitored
| catchment | Salinity | TSS (mg/l) | Chl (ug/l) | DIN (uM) | DON (uM) | TN (uM) | TP (uM) |
| BARRON | 29.16 | 18.66 | 1.18 | 3.66 | 7.29 | 7.23 | |
| BURDEKIN | 22.03 | 34.13 | 1.11 | 5.30 | 8.44 | 16.82 | 1.14 |
| DAINTREE | 26.87 | 10.69 | 0.81 | 1.75 | 4.50 | 6.30 | |
| FITZROY | 24.70 | 29.47 | 3.19 | 1.50 | 10.19 | 13.85 | 1.01 |
| HERBERT | 28.15 | 16.08 | 1.79 | 3.16 | 9.92 | 11.16 | |
| JOHNSTONE | 29.27 | 7.29 | 1.03 | 3.55 | 7.58 | 8.04 | 0.87 |
| LOWER BURDEKIN | 23.33 | 65.04 | 4.35 | 9.44 | 19.85 | 2.45 | |
| MACKAY-WHITSUNDAYS | 32.93 | 6.07 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 5.33 | 6.07 | 0.47 |
| OCONNELL | 3.97 | 2.06 | 1.60 | 8.30 | 13.62 | 1.09 | |
| RUSSELL-MULGRAVE | 30.16 | 18.38 | 1.13 | 1.24 | 7.47 | 8.50 | 0.47 |
| TOWNSVILLE | 18.06 | 25.77 | 1.02 | 5.06 | 8.34 | 19.12 | 1.77 |
| TRINITY | 14.63 | 1.58 | 9.64 | 13.19 | 37.63 | ||
| TULLY-MURRAY | 26.87 | 12.49 | 1.15 | 3.22 | 6.00 | 9.26 | 0.61 |
Reports from this project
These reports cover the work of this project in detail:
- Flood plume monitoring 2009-2010 (8.7 MB)
- Flood plume monitoring 2008-2009 (4.9 MB)
- Flood plume monitoring 2007-2008 (6.3 MB)
Project meta-data
The data collected by this project is described in more detail in the following meta-data record.
Maps in the e-Atlas
|
|
Flood plumes for 2011 wet season Extent of the flood plumes of the Fitzroy, Burnett, Mary and Brisbane Rivers caused by the extensive flooding that occurred in Queensland in December 2010 and January 2011.
Available in e-Atlas web mapping client under: Geography and Environment/QLD: Flood plumes 2011 (JCU) For more information see QLD - Flood Plumes 2011 (JCU, AIMS)
|





